<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sky is (not) Falling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnknoxwhite.com/2006/11/26/the-sky-is-not-falling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnknoxwhite.com/2006/11/26/the-sky-is-not-falling/</link>
	<description>mindfulness in the face of a challenge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://johnknoxwhite.com/2006/11/26/the-sky-is-not-falling/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnknoxwhite.com/?p=8#comment-8</guid>
		<description>In the beginning I tried to follow the Nothern Waterfront Specific Plan and went to at least three of the meetings before I lost track of it over a years time That was at least three years ago I think.

I ran into one of the staff of the consulating firm LSA who took the contract and asked after the process, and this person told me that it was up for a contract extension and they walked away and did not want the work. The exact reasons and status of the NWSP were not clear, but I  understood that the reason was shear frustration, though I&#039;m not sure if it was with the citizens on the committee for the process or City staff, or maybe both? I would like to know the gory details.

A note about Peter Wang. I think he is a charater. He was one of the stake holders who got to be on the NWSP committee. At the first meeting he expressed the opinion that property holders on the committee should have a stronger say in other members because of their &quot;investment&quot;.  Nice try Peter. It seems completely within Mr. Wang&#039;s style of doing business to have attempted to get this exclusive agreement without doing all the leg work first, though it&#039;s easy to see his point of view with regard to lenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the beginning I tried to follow the Nothern Waterfront Specific Plan and went to at least three of the meetings before I lost track of it over a years time That was at least three years ago I think.</p>
<p>I ran into one of the staff of the consulating firm LSA who took the contract and asked after the process, and this person told me that it was up for a contract extension and they walked away and did not want the work. The exact reasons and status of the NWSP were not clear, but I  understood that the reason was shear frustration, though I&#8217;m not sure if it was with the citizens on the committee for the process or City staff, or maybe both? I would like to know the gory details.</p>
<p>A note about Peter Wang. I think he is a charater. He was one of the stake holders who got to be on the NWSP committee. At the first meeting he expressed the opinion that property holders on the committee should have a stronger say in other members because of their &#8220;investment&#8221;.  Nice try Peter. It seems completely within Mr. Wang&#8217;s style of doing business to have attempted to get this exclusive agreement without doing all the leg work first, though it&#8217;s easy to see his point of view with regard to lenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Piziali</title>
		<link>http://johnknoxwhite.com/2006/11/26/the-sky-is-not-falling/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>John Piziali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnknoxwhite.com/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description>John:   I wish I had the time and ability to present the facts as you are doing here.  I will make sure to pass along this site to David K. perhaps it will help him  with things like the &quot;truth&quot;  John P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:   I wish I had the time and ability to present the facts as you are doing here.  I will make sure to pass along this site to David K. perhaps it will help him  with things like the &#8220;truth&#8221;  John P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alameda Joe</title>
		<link>http://johnknoxwhite.com/2006/11/26/the-sky-is-not-falling/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Alameda Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 23:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnknoxwhite.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Your first two posts are very informative. Lest you get caught in the trap of &quot;defending&quot; the City Council, I would suggest that you use this blog as  your opportunity to present your point of view regarding Alameda. You are very involved in transportation matters and I would especially like to read your comments on transportation matters. Of course, if exposing the &quot;truth&quot; is your passion then go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your first two posts are very informative. Lest you get caught in the trap of &#8220;defending&#8221; the City Council, I would suggest that you use this blog as  your opportunity to present your point of view regarding Alameda. You are very involved in transportation matters and I would especially like to read your comments on transportation matters. Of course, if exposing the &#8220;truth&#8221; is your passion then go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Hudson</title>
		<link>http://johnknoxwhite.com/2006/11/26/the-sky-is-not-falling/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnknoxwhite.com/?p=8#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John, for providing accurate information about current and past projects. I am sooo tired of the fact-less rants from the &quot;action alameda&quot; group. Your blog is a great antidote for my frustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John, for providing accurate information about current and past projects. I am sooo tired of the fact-less rants from the &#8220;action alameda&#8221; group. Your blog is a great antidote for my frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
