Comments on: Group Specs http://johnknoxwhite.com/2009/05/21/group-specs/ mindfulness in the face of a challenge Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:41:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: John Knox White http://johnknoxwhite.com/2009/05/21/group-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1635 John Knox White Fri, 22 May 2009 19:50:08 +0000 http://johnknoxwhite.com/?p=835#comment-1635 Sic [sic], in order for the ARRA to adopt the PDC, an EIR would have been needed to be completed and accepted. This was never done. The PDC was accepted, not adopted. Beyond that, there was support from the ARRA to continue exploring other design options, as called for in the appendix of the PDC. Sic [sic],

in order for the ARRA to adopt the PDC, an EIR would have been needed to be completed and accepted. This was never done.

The PDC was accepted, not adopted.

Beyond that, there was support from the ARRA to continue exploring other design options, as called for in the appendix of the PDC.

]]> By: sic of it http://johnknoxwhite.com/2009/05/21/group-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1633 sic of it Fri, 22 May 2009 18:21:15 +0000 http://johnknoxwhite.com/?p=835#comment-1633 As I recall the APCP plan was adopted by the city John. Maybe you missed it. The PB also discussed it at great length and approved it. It was called the "PDC". While it is theoretically possible for you honestly present unbiased facts, I am never surprised to see your posts always riddled with errors and misinformation. As I recall the APCP plan was adopted by the city John. Maybe you missed it. The PB also discussed it at great length and approved it. It was called the “PDC”.

While it is theoretically possible for you honestly present unbiased facts, I am never surprised to see your posts always riddled with errors and misinformation.

]]> By: Jayne Smythe http://johnknoxwhite.com/2009/05/21/group-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-1630 Jayne Smythe Thu, 21 May 2009 20:21:09 +0000 http://johnknoxwhite.com/?p=835#comment-1630 Yo, for a dude that is so concerned about TRAFFIC issues and pollution and such, seems to me like you are going against your own philosophy to favor an initiative that will bring more cars and pollution into town. But hey, its your right to have Hummers, too. The Alameda Point Vision is pertinent to what? Yo, for a dude that is so concerned about TRAFFIC issues and pollution and such, seems to me like you are going against your own philosophy to favor an initiative that will bring more cars and pollution into town.

But hey, its your right to have Hummers, too.

The Alameda Point Vision is pertinent to what?

]]>